Lie October 21, 2019 · Remarks · Impeachment (Ukraine)

“So do we have to protect somebody that gave a totally false account of my conversation? I don't know. You tell me. Do we have to protect the informant? Now, I happen to think there probably wasn't an informant. You know, the informant went to the whistleblower, the whistleblower had second- and third-hand information.”

Said
October 21, 2019
Where
Remarks
Verdict
Lie, as rated by the Washington Post Fact Checker
Topic
Impeachment (Ukraine)
Repeated
71 times in the Post’s database
Source
Washington Post claims database (claim ID 14119)

Search every impeachment (ukraine) lie → All 2019 lies

More lies about impeachment (ukraine)

  1. Oct 21, 2019 · Interview“You know why they don't need the whistleblower, because the whistleblower's account of my conversation was totally wrong.”
  2. Oct 21, 2019 · Interview“Then you can add Hunter Biden and Joe Biden on tape bragging about using taxpayer dollars to demand the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor.”
  3. Oct 21, 2019 · Remarks“Now, if you look at the whistleblower report and you look at the actual transcribed conversation -- the actual conversation that I had -- and you couple that with the President saying that that was a perfectly fine…
  4. Oct 21, 2019 · Remarks“And what happened is I released the conversation, and that threw Shifty Schiff off. Crooked -- he was a corrupt politician. Schiff is a corrupt politician. That threw him off because he made up a lie. He made up what…
  5. Oct 22, 2019 · Social post“So some day, if a Democrat becomes President and the Republicans win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can impeach the President, without due process or fairness or any legal rights. All Republicans must remember…
  6. Oct 20, 2019 · Social post“Where is the Whistleblower, or the 2nd Whistleblower, or the 'informant?' All gone..... ....because their so-called story didn't come even close to matching up with the exact transcript of the phone call.”